By: XaHara A. MeGod (formerly known as Megan Roberts)

Abstract

The 3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making (EEDM) presents an interdisciplinary framework that integrates somatic awareness, cultural competence, and ethical reasoning to advance inclusive and relationally ethical interactions. Rooted in dance/movement psychotherapy, interpersonal neurobiology, and relational counseling theories, the model emphasizes the embodied nature of decision-making and the role of neuroplasticity in reshaping unconscious biases and learned cultural responses. The 3M Model unfolds in three interconnected stages: Mutual Attunement, which cultivates self-awareness and embodied reflexivity; Mutual Movement, which engages kinesthetic empathy to challenge ingrained patterns and promote cultural sensitivity; and Mutual Synergy, which encourages ethical, reciprocal relationships through connection, disconnection, and the integration of neurobiological and relational integrity. By situating ethical decision-making within the dynamic intermesh of the head, heart, and gut brains, the model offers a holistic approach that transcends traditional cognition-based ethical paradigms. This article explores how the 3M Model serves as a transformative tool for practitioners across disciplines, providing a structured yet adaptable approach to ethical engagement, conflict resolution, and culturally attuned relational practices. Future research will continue to refine the model’s applications, further incorporating scientific, spiritual, and cultural paradigms to enhance its relevance across professional and social domains.

 

KEYWORDS: Kinesthetic empathy, Embodied Reflexivity, Ethics, Embodied, Astral/higher consciousness, Mutuality, neuroplasticity, cross-cultural relationships, community, spiritual/astral, science/biology, relationship building, counseling, relationship building

 

Figure 1

The 3 Mutualities (M’s) of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making

3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making

 

The new 3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making, a revision of its first publication in the National American Journal of Dance Therapy (Roberts, 2021), is part of an award-winning research initiative that provides protocols for building safe, effective, mutually inclusive, and culturally respectful relationships. Ethical decision-making, once thought of as a solely cognitive process, is an embodied phenomenon shaped by the intricate interplay of neurobiology, movement, and cultural conditioning. The 3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making (EEDM) advances this perspective by integrating somatic awareness, kinesthetic empathy, and neuroscience to provide a structured yet adaptable approach to relational ethics. Rooted in dance/movement psychotherapy, interpersonal neurobiology, and relational counseling theories, the model emphasizes how ethical choices emerge through the dynamic interaction of the three brains—the head, heart, and home (gut) brains—and the role of neuroplasticity in reshaping learned behaviors.

At the core of this framework is the recognition that embodied ethical decision-making is not merely a rational endeavor but one deeply influenced by mirror neurons, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and embodied relational attunement. Research in neuroscience highlights how mirror neurons facilitate kinesthetic empathy, enabling individuals to intuitively respond to the emotions and actions of others (Rizzolatti & Sinigaglia, 2010). Additionally, this article explores how encoded mtDNA powers the shaping of intergenerational behavioral patterns, impacting how individuals navigate ethical dilemmas within social and cultural contexts (Schurr, 2018). 

The 3M Model unfolds in three interdependent stages– Mutual Attunement, Mutual Movement, and Mutual Synergy– that improve and transform relational integrity. The interdisciplinary configuration of this model offers practical applications for therapists, educators, and leaders seeking to cultivate culturally responsive, neurobiologically informed, and somatically grounded embodied ethical decision-making for the purpose of fostering inclusive and sustainable human connections.

Foundations of Ethics

What is Ethics?

Ethics is a multifaceted concept that encompasses the navigation of right and wrong across various domains of human existence. It extends beyond human systems to include mental, physical, and spiritual aspects, as well as individual, communal, familial, interstate, and country-based contexts (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). At its core, ethics is a process of learning and deriving meaning from life experiences, cultural identities, and personal values, with the ultimate goal of fostering well-being.

The foundation of moral systems begins in the body, rooted in the sensations that drive our actions, thoughts, and emotions, even when these stimuli are unconscious (Damasio, 2018). This embodied approach to ethics challenges us to explore and observe our reasoning for right and wrong, moving beyond the programmed values instilled in us since utero through familial, environmental, educational, and governmental influences. By engaging in self-reflection and critical examination, we can develop a more authentic and nuanced ethical framework that aligns with our true selves and the greater good of society.

Ethical systems are both internal and external, manifesting in various contexts such as schools, communities, families, social circles, and affinity groups. Each cultural identity carries its own ethical configuration, contributing to the convoluded tapestry of moral considerations we navigate daily (Appiah, 2010). Identifying and understanding these diverse ethical systems is fundamental to making informed decisions in personal, familial, professional, and social spaces. By recognizing the reciprocity between these various ethical contexts, we can develop a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to navigating the labyrinth of right and wrong in our interconnected world.

Historical Development of Ethical Systems

The historical development of ethical systems refers to the evolution of moral philosophies and beliefs for determining right and wrong behavior throughout human history. This development reflects humanity’s ongoing efforts to understand and define moral behavior in an ever-changing world. It demonstrates how ethical thinking has been shaped by cultural, religious, philosophical, and social factors over time, providing essential context for modern ethical debates. By examining this historical progression, we gain valuable insights into the origins of current moral principles, allowing us to better comprehend and navigate contemporary ethical challenges. This understanding of ethical evolution enables us to appreciate the intricate exchanges between societal values, philosophical thought, and moral decision-making, ultimately informing our approach to ethical considerations in the present day.

Ethical Cultural Considerations

Ethics in cross-cultural relationships requires a deep understanding of cultural sensitivity and ethical decision-making. In a globalizing world, ethical challenges often arise from cultural misunderstandings, power imbalances, and differing value systems. To navigate these complications, it is essential to approach cross-cultural relationships with humility, curiosity, and a willingness to learn from others’ perspectives. The Gottman Method offers valuable insights for maintaining healthy relationships in the synergy stage. Key principles include building a culture of appreciation and respect, managing conflicts constructively, and creating shared meaning and goals within the relationship. These principles help nurture a foundation of trust and understanding that supports the development of mutual synergy.

• Building a culture of appreciation and respect: This involves recognizing and valuing the unique contributions of each individual, cultivating an environment where all parties feel seen and heard.
• Managing conflicts constructively: Conflict is inevitable in any relationship, but how it is managed determines the health of the relationship. Exercises from the Gottman Method emphasizes the importance of addressing conflicts with empathy and understanding, rather than defensiveness or blame (Gottman, J.M., & DeClaire, J., 2001) (Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N., 2015).
• Creating shared meaning and goals within the relationship: Shared goals and values create a sense of unity and purpose, strengthening the bond between individuals.

Divine Influence in Ethics

In situations where relational synergy appears imbalanced or inequitable, adopting a spiritually informed perspective in the context of embodied ethical decision-making becomes particularly valuable. Central to this, the cultivation of spiritual trust—a willingness to relinquish rigid control over relational outcomes and instead embrace intuitive guidance from higher consciousness. Drawing upon the transformative insights of Caroline Myss (2001), spiritual trust involves recognizing esoteric influences embedded within everyday interactions, particularly those experienced through embodied practices and movement. Rather than attempting to control every relational moment, individuals are encouraged to remain open to intuitive wisdom, allowing interactions to unfold organically and authentically.

This spiritually informed ethical stance aligns harmoniously with culturally respectful practices by honoring diverse spiritual beliefs and cultural identities. Recognizing spiritual influences as integral puzzle pieces within the broader tapestry of human existence advances mutual respect for individual differences in belief systems, life purposes, soul contracts, and cultural narratives. Respecting these esoteric dimensions ethically guides practitioners of embodied ethics toward culturally sensitive engagement and enlightening experiences of interconnectedness across esoteristic planes. 

Spiritual trust acknowledges that perceived imbalances or discomforts may serve higher purposes within broader relational dynamics—potentially extending beyond immediate circumstances or even a single lifetime. Rather than striving for immediate resolution or control, individuals are encouraged to remain open to deeper meanings and transcendental connections reflective of our shared human journey.

Embodied Science: A Path to Ethical Decision-Making

Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity, the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections that emerge as contextually new understandings and habits of operating life, is what constitutes shaping human behavior that optimistically is a result of moral and integral acquisition of knowledge (Siegel, 2020). Neuroplastic transformations is a consequence of learning. This process allows the brain to adapt to experiences, learning, and trauma, actively rewiring pathways based on repeated thoughts, emotions, and actions (Helmstetter, 2019). Neuroplasticity occurs at both the synaptic and structural levels, meaning that experiences and interactions continuously shape the neural networks that govern perception, decision-making, and social engagement (Siegel, 2020). This adaptability is particularly significant in human relationships, as ingrained patterns of interaction—whether constructive or harmful—are reinforced through repeated behaviors. When individuals engage in self-reflective practices, such as mindfulness, movement-based therapies, or intentional cognitive restructuring, they can actively reshape neural pathways to cultivate healthier relational dynamics (Siegel, 2020). 

Harnessing neuroplasticity with intentionality provides a foundation for ethical insight and relational healing. Research demonstrates that pairing practices such as embodied reflection, allowing time for neural processing of new information with somatic attunement, with compassion, emotional regulation, and social attunement enhances learning and development of healthy behaviors (Vettraino, 2019; Davidson & McEwen, 2012). By consciously engaging in experiences that promote positive neuroplastic renovations and nurturing increased embodied awareness—individuals can heal neuronal connections that reinforce divisive behaviors and systemic inequities (i.e., cognitive distortions, programmed cultural biases, and ineffective behaviors patterns). This process enables the cultivation of relationships grounded in mutual respect, accountability, and ethical integrity. 

Kinesthetic Empathy and Cultural Sensitivity 

Kinesthetic empathy (KE) is a significant role in each stage of the 3M Model, allowing individuals to form deep mind-body-emotional connections. KE refers to the body’s somatic response to the movements, gestures, external attributes (e.g., appearance), and internal emotional states of another person through the activation of mirror neurons. Mirror neurons are specialized sensory-motor neurons located in the brain that become active both when an individual observes another person performing an action and when the individual executes the same action. These neurons “mirror” the observed behavior, forming internal representations as if the observer were performing the action themselves (Artpradid, 2023) (Rizzolatti & Sinigaglia, 2010). Mirroring exercises, often used in therapeutic settings, is a form of kinesthetic empathy in which an individual reflects another’s movements, body language, and gestures, potentially also resonating with their emotions, directly engages the KE system. 

The somatic mechanism of KE is the neurological basis for empathy development and social learning. When left unnoticed, these neuronal responses can elicit emotions, feelings, and behaviors that can often lead to unconscious biases and poor social behaviors. Reciprocal and embodied acts used to intentionally develop relational connectedness and belonging is a powerhouse for community building when cross-cultural dynamics are present (Artpradid, 2023). When engaged in mirroring, individuals attune to proprioceptive and sensory information and body-based neuronal processes begin to reflect and react to the physical and emotional states of the connection by stimulating the release of the bonding hormone–oxytocin, reinforcing social bonding. 

With the bodily dimension of KE, and its correlation to neuroplasticity of learning, activation of neural pathways associated with social cognition, emotional regulation, and intersubjective understanding will ultimately enhance positive relationship-building experiences. Engaging in kinesthetic empathy over time strengthens adaptive relational behvaiors. Through repeated attunement to KE, combined with intentional efforts to shift ingrained and insentive behavioral patterns, individuals can rewire unconscious biases and conditioned cultural responses and develop more inclusive and respectful human relationships with ethical engagement in diverse social settings.

The Three Brains: A Biological Perspective

In the elaborate landscape of human evolution and relationships, our understanding of human behavior has evolved significantly over the years, revealing a fascinating interaction between biology and psychology. Within the human body, three brains have been documented as contributors to our interpersonal choices and patterns. Examining these three main processing centers will provide valuable insight into the biological factors that influence embodied decision-making and drive social interactions across cultures.

 

Understanding the Three Brains and Their Role in Relationships

Recent scientific discoveries have unveiled a fascinating truth: we possess not one, but three distinct “brains” that work in concert to shape our experiences and interactions with the world. Three brains—the Head Brain, Heart Brain, and Home Brain—along with ancestral DNA and neuroplasticity, is the beginning to grasping the concept of embodied ethics and how to reform historically programmed and automatic behvaiors. 

 

The Head Brain: Our Cognitive Powerhouse. The Head Brain, housed within our skull, is perhaps the most familiar of the three. With approximately 86 billion neurons, it is responsible for rational thought, logic, cognition, and perception. However, its role extends far beyond these higher functions:

• Primitive Functions: The Head Brain also manages essential survival functions such as breathing, blood flow, and heart rate.
• Evolutionary Layers: It comprises three main evolutionary layers:
  1. The Reptilian Brain (500 million years old): Controls basic survival functions.
  2. The Limbic System (150 million years old): Regulates emotions via the amygdala and hippocampus.
  3. The Executive Brain (2-3 million years old): Organizes and processes logical thinking.

Ethical decision-making requires more than logic alone. While the head brain provides reasoning and structure, it is limited in holistic decision-making of allowing the body to have a voice and presence in our relationships. The head brain is deeply influenced by the heart and home brain’s emotional and intuitive intelligences. 

 

The Heart Brain: Emotional Intelligence Center. Often overlooked, the Heart Brain plays the paramount and leading role in our emotional and social lives:

• Neuron Concentration: Contains 40,000-120,000 neurons, significantly fewer than the Head Brain.
• Magnetic Field: Generates a magnetic field 100 times more powerful than the Head Brain.
• Information Processing: Responsible for intake of new information, which it then sends to the Head and Home Brain via a bidirectional channels.
• Hormone Production: Produces dopamine (the “reward” hormone) and oxytocin (for positive feelings and social bonding).

The heart brain serves as a bridge between external experiences and internal responses, acting as a filter that shapes how we emotionally and physiologically process the world attune emotionally to our relationships. As it contains fewer neurons than the other tow brains yet generates an electromagnetic field ten times more powerful, it not only influences emotional well-being but also communicates vital information to the head and gut brains that ultimately determine their structuring and restructuring. 

 

The Home Brain: The Emotional Regulator. The Home Brain, known as the Gut Brain, or enteric nervous system, has a profound impact on our emotional and physiological well-being. It is here that it is name Home Brain for its intuitive and cultural impact in our life and preservation civilization and survival:

• Neuron Count: Contains approximately 500 million neurons.
• Serotonin Production: Produces 95% of the body’s serotonin, important for mood and sleep regulation.
• Stress Response: Can produce benzodiazepines to sedate the body during stress.
• Emotional Regulation: Signals the limbic system to downregulate emotional responses to stress via the Vagus Nerve.

 The Home Brain, deeply tied to intuition and cultural memory, serves as the foundation for emotional regulation and survival. Through its vast neural network and serotonin production, it influences mood, resilience, and stress responses, shaping both individual well-being and collective preservation. By communicating with the limbic system (Head Brain) via the vagus nerve, it ensures that emotional and instinctual insights are combined into decision-making, reinforcing the embodied nature of ethical awareness and adaptive intelligence.

The Vagus Nerve: The Great Connector

The Vagus Nerve, the longest and notably the most complex cranial nerves, connects the three brains in the body and is directly connected to our parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and medulla, the facilitators of rest in the body-mind. Because the vagus nerve performs a vital role in connecting the three brains—the head, heart, and gut—a unifying approach to embodied ethical decision-making becomes feasible. It serves as a communication pathway by creating a synchronized network that manages both rational and emotional processing with conscious activation and links these three neural centers together to develop a state of harmony among the three brains. This alignment is the fundamental process of embodied ethical decision-making, as it includes cognitive thought, emotional intelligence, and somatic intuition. The role of the vagus nerve, in this context, is major in ensuring that these neural systems communicate and function in concert. The three brains, when in sync, provide space for magnifying informed, empathetic, and culturally sensitive social choices that go beyond intellectual reasoning. 

Neuronal interconnectedness forms the foundation of the 3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making, encouraging individuals to engage in ethical decisions with a holistic understanding of their embodied selves. Understandings in neurobiology has revealed that decision-making is not solely governed by rational thought in the head brain but is also deeply influenced by the heart brain and gut brain (Porges, 2011). Interplay of cognition, emotion, and intuition is central. When these three neural centers work in concert, shaping our perceptions, responses, and interpersonal interactions on cognitive, emotional, and instinctual levels, we evolve an intelligent embodied ethical awareness that then enables informed interpretation relational experiences. Often at a subconscious though, is an ancient, purposeful, and powerful mediator of social behvaiors–ancestral DNA.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)

Substantially, our genetics makeup social constructs. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), often referred to as the “Eve gene,” carries ancestral lineage information that has been passed down through generations, linking present-day individuals to their ancient maternal ancestors (Schurr, 2018). This unique form of DNA is exclusively inherited from the mother and shows significance in cellular function, particularly in the brain. MtDNA powers all neuronal activity within the three interconnected brain centers—the head, heart, and gut—by providing the necessary energy for synaptic transmission and cognitive processing (Gershon, 2018). Additionally, mtDNA is deeply involved in neuroplasticity, the brain’s capacity to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections in response to experiences, learning, and environmental influences (Porges, 2011). Given that each mitochondrion contains thousands of copies of ancestral DNA, this genetic material not only sustains fundamental biological processes but also influences behavioral patterns and memory encoding across generations (Jablonka & Lamb, 2005). In a single neuron, anywhere from 1,000 to 600,000 mitochondria can be present, supporting the continuous adaptation and refinement of neural pathways (Schurr, 2018). Furthermore, mtDNA can trace ancestral lineage as far back as 100,000 to 200,000 years, spanning an estimated 4,000 to 8,000 generations, demonstrating its profound role in the transmission of genetic memory and intergenerational knowledge (MacLean, 1990). Understanding the function of mtDNA provides insight into how embodied cognition and intergenerational inheritance shape not only biological but also cultural and behavioral evolution over time.

Ancestral DNA and neuroplasticity, deeply intertwined in shaping human behavior, social interactions, and cultural perceptions, are products of environmental conditioning (Schurr, 2018). These inherited patterns, often operating at a subconscious level, inform our perceptions of social norms, emotional regulation, and relational dynamics. What is frequently accepted as “human nature” is or acceptable human to human treatment are, in many cases, the result of intergenerational programming—deeply ingrained responses shaped by survival strategies, systemic oppression, and cultural narratives that have been reinforced over time (Jablonka & Lamb, 2005). While these patterns have historically served adaptive functions, they may also perpetuate implicit biases and carry barriers to cross-cultural connections.

Embodied ethical decision-making provides a pathway for disrupting inherited limitations and employing embodied practices such as neuroplasticity and KE that challenge harmful and conditioned responses and encourage new relational behaviors that support empathy, trust, and collaboration across cultural differences. The 3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making is a catalystic structure to support the facilitation of such a process, creating space for individuals to pause, reflect, and engage in movement-based and relational practices that facilitate rewiring at both somatic and cognitive levels. 

Embodied Decision-Making Processes

Decision-making exists on a spectrum, ranging from unconscious, instinctive reactions to consciously reflective and fully harmonized responses. Our ability to navigate this spectrum is shaped by both evolutionary survival mechanisms and neuroplastic adaptations. Understanding these levels of decision-making can cultivate greater self-awareness and develop more ethical, culturally sensitive responses in our interactions.

Reactive: Unconscious

Reactive decisions originate from our deepest, most primitive brain structures. This type of movement is largely unconscious, rooted in our mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and repressed memories. It manifests as instinctive reactions that occur without conscious thought, often appearing as if they “just happened.” These movements are authentic and natural, deeply ingrained in our evolutionary history for the longevity and survival of our species.

Reflective: The Conscious

Reflective decisions are primarily associated with our conscious brain. However, recent research suggests that these reactions may occur a split second before we become aware of making a decision – moreso, we have a small moment of decision-making before it happens compared to a reflexive response – , challenging our understanding of free will (Vettraino, 2019). Reflective decisions are often pattern responses shaped by our present life experiences and environmental programming.

Unlike reactive decisions, reflective responses may not be programmed into our unconscious or mtDNA. Instead, they serve as temporary survival mechanisms for our present life circumstances. These movements are more malleable and can be influenced by neuroplasticity, allowing for adaptation and learning based on current environmental demands.

Responsive: The Integrative

Responsive decisions are a bridge between conscious and unconscious processes. Responsiveness uses neuronal processes to integrate information from both reflective and reactive systems, allowing for more nuanced decision-making. It involves embodied reflexivity, enabling neural connections to intervene and generate new, more appropriate responses to environmental situations within relational dynamics (Vettraino, 2019).

This harmonizing response enhances thoughtful personal behaviors and actions within cross-cultural interactions. Over time and with practice, it becomes easier to decide on a way to act or respond, as the brain learns to balance instinctive reactions with conscious deliberation. This process of integration leads to resilient, interpersonally positive, culturally sensitive, and ultimately. . . embodied ethical decision-making.

 

Figure 2

The 3M’s of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making

Note. 3M Model with a brief description of each M.

The Three M’s of Mutuality

Human connection is both an art and a science. The 3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making offers a framework for improving meaningful connections through three progressive stages: Mutual Attunement, Mutual Movement, and Mutual Synergy. Each stage provides a pathway for enhancing self-awareness, deepening interpersonal understanding, and cultivating ethical relational engagement through an embodied lens.

At the core of this model lies the recognition that relational patterns are not solely cognitive or behavioral but are also encoded within the body and nervous system. Neuroplasticity—the brain’s ability to rewire itself based on experience—plays a critical role in shaping these interactions, as does ancestral DNA, which carries generational influences that shape subconscious social behaviors (Porges, 2011; Jablonka & Lamb, 2005). By intentionally engaging in the 3M Model, individuals can begin to challenge inherited patterns of relational engagement, dismantle biases, and co-create relationships that are rooted in trust, mutuality, and cultural sensitivity.

The following sections explore each stage of the 3M Model in detail, providing insights into how individuals can notice, engage, and utilize each phase to cultivate stronger, more ethical, and embodied connections in both personal and professional settings.

 

Mutual Attunement

Attunement is the first stage of the 3M Model, emphasizing the importance of slowing down, pausing, and engaging in intentional self-reflection. This stage involves a mindful connection with one’s physical, emotional, and mental states, creating a foundation for greater self-awareness and empathy. As outlined by Daniel Siegel’s Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB), reflective practices enhance both self-understanding and the ability to empathize with others, merging the mind, body, and emotions into a unified, holistic awareness (Siegel, 2020). This attunement process produces what can be considered “whole-body intelligence,” which prepares individuals to empathetically attune to others.

How to Notice, Engage, and Utilize Mutual Attunement:

• Notice: Pay attention to physical sensations, emotional states, and mental patterns during interactions.
• Engage: Practice mindfulness techniques such as deep breathing, body scans, and reflective journaling to deepen self-awareness.
• Utilize: Use the insights gained from attunement to guide your interactions, ensuring that you approach relationships with empathy and understanding.

Mutual Movement

Mutual movement builds upon the foundation of attunement, coordinating the awareness and empathy gained during that process into movement-based interactions. Mutual movement encompasses any physical motion sensed or experienced by you or others, creating a shared, collaborative space for interaction and engagement.

How to Notice, Engage, and Utilize Mutual Movement:

• Notice: Observe the physical movements of others, as well as your own, during interactions.
• Engage: Participate in shared movement practices such as dance/movement or synchronized breathing exercises to promote connection.
• Utilize: Use movement as a tool for communication, allowing it to convey emotions and intentions that words cannot express.

Mutual Synergy

Mutual synergy requires ongoing attention to power dynamics and cultural differences within relationships. This involves acknowledging and respecting the spiritual and physical make-up programming of individuals, as well as their cultural needs.

How to Notice, Engage, and Utilize Mutual Synergy:

• Notice: Be aware of power imbalances and cultural differences in your relationships.
• Engage: Address these imbalances openly and honestly, using mediation techniques to resolve conflicts.
• Utilize: Develop a sense of unity and cooperation by creating shared goals and values within the relationship.

 

Oxytocin & Cultivating Connection and Managing Disconnection. The role of oxytocin in promoting synchronous movement and social bonding is a fascinating area of research that sheds light on the biological underpinnings of human cooperation and empathy. Studies have shown that oxytocin, often called the bonding hormone, has a necessary role in enhancing interpersonal synchrony and coordinated behaviors.

Practical Strategies for Achieving Mutual Synergy

Achieving mutual synergy requires a sustained commitment to relational awareness, ethical engagement, and adaptability. Individuals must engage in ongoing dialogue about their evolving choices, needs, and expectations while remaining receptive to the perspectives of others. Establishing and articulating clear personal boundaries with respect ensures relational balance, while utilizing structured conflict resolution techniques—such as mediation, active listening, and perspective-taking—enhances collaborative problem-solving. Approaching disagreements through methods like the Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) helps navigate conflicts with fairness and accountability.

To deepen relational integrity, individuals should implement mutual accountability structures, such as reflective check-ins, co-created agreements, and culturally responsive engagement strategies. Developing somatic awareness through embodied practices—such as synchronized breathing, mirroring exercises, and intentional movement—strengthens interpersonal attunement and trust. Awareness of neural processes linked to the head, heart, and home (gut) brains allows individuals to recognize conditioned responses, regulate emotional triggers, and dismantle unconscious biases. Over time, alignment between cognitive reasoning, emotional intelligence, and somatic intuition refines ethical decision-making, promoting relationships that are equitable, attuned, and deeply engaged. By committing to these intentional practices, individuals contribute to a relational paradigm that transcends traditional, cognition-driven ethics, embracing a holistic and embodied approach to decision-making across professional, social, and communal settings.

 

Discussion

The current exploration of the 3M Model represents a foundational component within a broader discourse on embodied ethics—a holistic approach to embodied ethical decision-making to engage in safe and culturally competent relational dynamics. As the discussion and practice of embodied ethics continues to move forward, attention must be focused on relational sustenation.

Maintenance & Accountability 

Healthy relational engagements are not one-and-done arrangements; they require maintenance, refreshers, consistent repair, and transformation as individuals grow and change over time. The 3M Model emphasizes the importance of ongoing self-reflection, communication, and adaptation to ensure that relationships remain healthy and fulfilling. Achieving relational maintainence is an ongoing neuroplastic process. Concepts of neuroplasticity, KE, somatic awareness, relational protocols of safety and healthy connections, cultural comptency, and synergistic movement, increases the ability to adapt to relational dynamics and foster meaningful and ethical connections. 

Embodied Ethics: A New Paradigm for Ethical Decision-Making

The 3M Model transcends traditional ethics by incorporating a divine ethical system, rooted in the natural order of existence. Unlike man-made laws, which often fail to deliver real justice, embodied ethics is concerned with the soul’s journey, the human experience, and the greater good of all life forms. This approach calls for an embodied moral system that melds the wisdom of the soul, the lived experience of the human self, and the utilitarian desire to create a better world.

Ethical decision-making, as outlined in the 3M Model, is a process of continual attunement, movement, and synergy. It involves deepening our understanding of ourselves and others, challenging inherited patterns, and building relationships based on mutual respect, empathy, and cultural awareness. By engaging in this practice, we can achieve healing, harmony, and true ethical integrity in all aspects of life.

This research is a foundational piece in the broader discussion of embodied ethics, which seeks to fuse cultural sensitivity, cultural competence, and inclusivity into ethical decision-making. It addresses and connects moral beliefs from a holistic perspective, incorporating mind, body, spirit, emotion, and science with laws, ethics, and relational protocols into a cohesive framework for ethical engagement. As this research continues to develop, it will provide a comprehensive foundation for embodied ethical decision-making that honors the full spectrum of human experience.

Conclusion

The 3M Model of Embodied Ethical Decision-Making—Mutual Attunement, Movement Engagement, and Mutual Synergy– presents a comprehensive exploration of embodied ethical decision-making through innovative methods. Grounded in interdisciplinary insights from dance movement therapy (Hervey, 2007), interpersonal neurobiology (Siegel, 2012), relationship counseling (Gottman & Silver, 2015), kinesthetic empathy (Fischman, 2009), neuroplasticity (Siegel, 2020), ancestral DNA (Schurr, 2018), and holistic spiritual foundations (Porges, 2011), the model provides a vigorous foundation for navigating intracacies cross-cultural relationships ethically.

By unifying reflective self-awareness (attunement), embodied kinesthetic empathy (movement), and collaborative relational dynamics (synergy), practitioners can nurture deeper interpersonal connections characterized by mutual respect and cultural competence. The interplay between conscious cognitive processes (Head Brain), emotional intelligence (Heart Brain), intuitive regulation (Gut Brain), ancestral influences (mtDNA), and kinesthetic empathy practices (Gershon, 2018; MacLean, 1990; Armour, 2003; McCraty et al., 2009) collectively informs our behavioral intentions. 

As it becomes evident, the intricate relationship between biology, behavior, and ethics, the 3M Model opens new avenues for personal growth and social harmony. This embodied ethical framework invites continuous exploration into holistic relational dynamics that honor mind-body-spirit interconnectedness. As research progresses toward greater integration of these multifaceted dimensions—laws, ethics, science-informed somatics, relational attunement strategies—the 3M Model stands poised not only as a practical tool but also as an evolving paradigm for optimal cross-cultural relational structures.

References

 

Albertini, D., Lanzilotto, M., Maranesi, M., Livi, A., Fogassi, L., & Bonini, L. (2021). Mirror neurons activation by biological and non-biological stimuli in macaques’ premotor cortex: Implications for action understanding theories. Journal of Neurophysiology, 126(3), 846–856. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00216.2021

 

Appiah, K. A. (2010). The honor code: How moral revolutions happen. W. W. Norton & Company.

Armour, J. A. (2003). Neurocardiology: Anatomical and functional principles. HeartMath Research Center.

 

Artpradid, V (2023). Kinesthetic empathic witnessing in relation to embodied and extended cognition: An exploration. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2181486.

 

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

 

Behrends, A., Müller, S., & Dziobek, I. (2012). Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new intervention fostering empathy through interactional movement and dance. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 39(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2012.02.003

 

Bradley, R., & Green, J. (2018). Shared decision-making in healthcare: Historical perspectives and future directions. Journal of Participatory Medicine, 10(1), e5.

 

Damasio, A. (2018). The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures. Pantheon Books.

Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 689-695.

Fischman, D. (2009). Therapeutic relationships and kinesthetic empathy. In S. Chaiklin & H. Wengrower (Eds.), The art and science of dance/movement therapy (pp. 33-52). Routledge.

 

Gallese, V., Gernsbacher, M. A., Heyes, C., Hickok, G., & Iacoboni, M. (2011). Mirror neuron forum. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(4), 369–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611413392

 

Gebauer, L., Witek, M. A., Hansen, N. C., Thomas, J., Konvalinka, I., & Vuust, P. (2016). Oxytocin improves synchronisation in leader-follower interaction. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 38416. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38416

 

Gershon, M. D. (2018). The second brain: A groundbreaking new understanding of nervous disorders of the stomach and intestine. Harper Perennial.

 

Gottman, J. M., & DeClaire, J. (2001). The relationship cure: A 5-step guide to strengthening your marriage, family, and friendships. Harmony Books.

 

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work. Harmony Books.

 

Hartling, L., & Miller, J. B. (2004). Moving toward mutuality: Relational-cultural theory and human rights advocacy. In J.V Jordan & L.M Hartling (Eds.), The complexity of connection: Writings from the Stone Center’s Jean Baker Miller Training Institute (pp. 47–63). Guilford Press.

 

Helmstetter, S. (2019). The power of neuroplasticity. Park Avenue Press.

 

Heyes, C., & Catmur, C. (2022). What happened to mirror neurons? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621990638

 

Hervey, L. W. (2007). Embodied ethical decision making. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 29(2), 91-108.

 

Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M.J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.

 

MacLean, P. D. (1990). The triune brain in evolution: Role in paleocerebral functions. Plenum Press.

 

McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., Tomasino, D., & Bradley, R.T. (2009). The coherent heart: Heart-brain interactions, psychophysiological coherence, and the emergence of system-wide order. Integral Review, 5(2), 10–115.

 

Mu, Y., Guo, C., & Han, S. (2016). Oxytocin enhances inter-brain synchrony during social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(42), 11603-11608.

 

Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20(8), 750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.045

 

Myss, C. (2001). Sacred contracts: Awakening your divine potential. Harmony Books.

 

Porges, S.W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication and self-regulation. W.W Norton & Company.

 

Rizzolatti, G., & Fabbri-Destro, M. (2010). Mirror neurons: From discovery to autism. Experimental Brain Research, 200(3-4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2002-9

 

Rizzolatti, G., & Fabbri-Destro, M. (2010). Mirror neurons: From discovery to autism research and beyond. In P.A.M Van Lange (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 223–257). Academic Press.

 

Roberts, M. (2021). Embodied ethical decision-making: A clinical case study of respect for culturally based meaning making in mental healthcare. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 43, 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10465-020-09338-3

 

Schurr T.G. (2018). Mitochondrial DNA and the peopling of the new world: Genetic insights into ancient migrations across Beringia into North America and beyond [Review Article]. American Scientist, 106(4), 232–239.

 

Siegel, D. J. (2020). Clinical implications and applications of neuroplasticity [Video]. Alexander Street.

 

Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. Guilford Press.

 

Tarr, B., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Music and social bonding: “Self-other” merging and neurohormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1096.

 

Vettraino, E., Linds, W. & Downie, H. (2019). Embodied reflexivity: discerning ethical practice through the Six-Part Story Method. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives.

 

Winters M.F.(2008). Inclusive excellence: Building culturally competent organizations [Special issue]. Diversity at Work, 1(3), 205–228.